Our pure JavaScript Scheduler component


Post by andrew.perera »

Hi Team,

As you know we use: https://bryntum.com/products/scheduler/examples/drag-between-schedulers/
structure and we have already utilised independent scrolling using - the 'removePartner' function.

However, if we use shiftNext() or shiftPrevious() for each scheduler instance they still move together.
Is this something we can do or would you suggest some option to get the following functionality?

grid.png
grid.png (102.02 KiB) Viewed 828 times

As you can see we have a lock/unlock method with a padlock to activate independent scrolling using removePartner/addPartner

  1. We want to introduce two arrows as per the picture so that we can navigate the time axis.
  2. When we remove the partner scheduler we should be able to navigate only the bottom grid unit by unit in time axis by using arrows.

Appreciate your help.


Post by tasnim »

Hi,

Thanks for your report. We'll investigate it. Here is the ticket to track progress https://github.com/bryntum/support/issues/7045

All The Best,
Tasnim


Post by andrew.perera »

Hi Team, do we have any update on this?


Post by marcio »

Hey andrew.perera,

Unfortunately no updates, but I added a note to the ticket.

Best regards,
Márcio


Post by andrew.perera »

Hi Team,
I'm not sure this is a new feature. I have noticed the bug label was removed. The expectation of removing a partner grid means schedulers should get independent control. It took about three months already.
Thanks.


Post by Animal »

The TimeAxis is shared between partnered schedulers.

This will have to be dynamically managed if partnership is broken then recreated.

https://github.com/bryntum/support/issues/7542


Post by andrew.perera »

Hi Team, any progress on this?


Post by marcio »

Hey andrew.perera,

We already have a PR for solving that issue, so it should be released soon. :)

Best regards,
Márcio


Post by andrew.perera »

Hey Marcio, any update on this?


Post by ghulam.ghous »

Hi Andrew,

We have discussed this internally and increased the priority to high (you can see here https://github.com/bryntum/support/issues/7542). So it will be fixed soon as we tend to fix high priority tickets in a release timespan.

Regards,
Ghous


Post Reply